Reina Valera Gómez (RVG) 2010 Spanish Bible | Hardbound

Description: Reina Valera Gómez (RVG) 2010 Spanish Bible | Hardbound | "T͟e͟x͟t͟u͟s͟ R͟e͟c͟e͟p͟t͟u͟s͟" ISBN: 9780758908032 Pages: 1249 - Hardbound Price: ̶$̶2̶2̶.̶4̶5̶ On sale now only at Pass the Word KJB Reina Valera Gómez (RVG) 2010 Spanish Bible, hardbound, Scripture text with thematic concordance. No maps or center references. Pew Bible. Only 1" thick! If you have any issues with your order: lost packages, damaged in shipment, late arrival, etc. Please contact us directly via eBay messaging so that we can promptly resolve the issue beyond your greatest satisfaction. Please do not open a case with eBay or leave negative feedback before allowing us to resolve this for you. Thank you so much for your help. May God bless you and yours. To ensure arrival by Christmas, please choose Priority Mail Shipping. Media Mail can take up to 21 shipping days & up to 3 days processing Bibles are ordered after December 16th; we cannot guarantee delivery by Christmas. Merry Christmas! Features include: Hardbound cover A 97-page concordance Only 1" think 10 pt font Dimensions 6.25 x 9.25 inches 1249 pages The words of God preserved in Spanish Readers have long known of problems in the Spanish Bible. The beloved Reina Valera was based on the Textus Receptus (TR) used by the early church but Valera himself said corrections were still needed. Revisions including the RV 1909 and 1960 were supposed to fix the problems, but instead added liberal readings changing God's words, even taking Jesus (Son of God) out of the fiery furnace in Daniel 3:25 and replacing him with a "son of the gods.". The RVG 2010 fixes that. After years of work, the Reina Valera Gómez (RVG) Bible is finally available. Finally, a true, "Textus Receptus" Spanish Bible, the RVG has been proofread and refined by Spanish-speaking Christians in 13 countries. This revision of the RV 1909 is the first Spanish Bible that is not the product of a small committee. Dr. Rex Cobb, of Baptist Bible Translators Institute, compared the RVG with other common Spanish Bibles to see how many times they departed from the traditional text (the TR). Here are the results: *The 1569 departed from the TR 75 times *The 1602 departed from the TR 57 times. *The 1862 departed from the TR 118 times. *The 1865 departed from the TR 28 times. *The 1909 departed from the TR 122 times. *The 1960 departed from the TR 191 times. *The 2001 departed from the TR 69 times. *The RVG departed from the TR ZERO times. The Spanish Bible Which one should you use: 1602, 1865, 1909, 1960? There is a lot of confusion today about which Spanish Bible should be used. Most Bible believing churches have heard mainly about four different Spanish versions of the Reina-Valera: the 1602, 1865, 1909 and 1960—even though there are many other versions. Which of these Spanish Bibles is correct? Which Spanish Bible should all Spanish speaking people and ministries use? Which Spanish Bible is true to the Textus Receptus and Masoretic texts —the source of our blessed King James Bible? As Barry Burton said: “Let’s weigh the evidence.” I would like to show 5 reasons why my conscience could never allow me to use the 1602,1865,1909 or 1960 Spanish Bibles. 1. In many places the 1602, 1865 and 1909 uses the word salud (health) instead of “salvación” (salvation). For example: Genesis 49:18 I have waited for thy salvation, O LORD. (KJV) The Spanish versions say: I have waited for thy health, O Lord (1602, 1865, and 1909) See what happens when we substitute “health” for “salvation in these verses: Exodus 14:13 And Moses said unto the people, Fear ye not, stand still, and see the health of the LORD, which he will shew to you to day: for the Egyptians whom ye have seen to day, ye shall see them again no more for ever. (See the 1602, 1865 and 1909). Titus 2:11 for the grace of God that bringeth health hath appeared to all men. (See the 1602, 1865 and 1909.) Romans 10:10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto health. (See the 1602, 1865 and 1909.) There are more than 100 verses that say salud (health) instead of salvation Many will say, “Yes but salud (health) in the old Spanish tongue meant spiritual health (salvation). It also meant physical health for your body and well being.” In the past, yes, but in the Spanish world today when they hear the word salud (health) they think of health for your body not salvation for your soul. There are no misunderstandings when we use the word SALVATION. Even the 1602, 1865 and 1909 use the word salvación (salvation) in other verses. The first definition for the word salud is physical health for your body in every Spanish dictionary. Note Jeremiah 30:13: No hay quien te ponga salud: no hay para tí cura ni medicinas.(1602, 1865 and 1909 ) Here the word salud (health) means health for your body, because it needs to be cured with medicine. The word health here is not used for salvation but for curing the body! In fact, most places in the 1602, 1865 and 1909 substitute the word “health” for “salvation” in some places, and in other places use the word “salvation”, even though they are translating the exact same Hebrew or Greek word! So we see that the Spanish versions of the Bible know the differences between salud for the body and salvación for the soul! Act 4:12 Y en ningún otro hay salud; porque no hay otro nombre debajo del cielo, dado a los hombres, en que nos sea necesario ser salvos. (1602, 1865 and 1909) It would read like this in ENGLISH: Act 4:12 Neither is there health in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved. They use the word “health” (salud) here instead of “salvation.” The Greek word in this verse is “salvation” σωτηρία (sōtēria). Rev 7:10 Y clamaban a alta voz, diciendo: La salvación a nuestro Dios que está sentado sobre el trono, y al Cordero. But here in this verse they use “salvation” instead of salud (health). Both verses have the same Greek word σωτηρία (sōtēria): The same Greek word, same definition, same meaning but they used two different words. They could have used the word salvation in every place where it needs to be! The truth is it should say, “salvation.” How many times do Spanish Bibles have the word “salvation”? 1.The 1602 has the word in 11 verses 2.The 1865 has the word in 17 verses 3.The 1909 has the word in 19 verses 4.The 1960 has the word in 165 verses (the 1960 is better than the others with the word Salvation) 5.The RVG has the word in 167 verses Many will say to me after writing this, “Brother Mike, you don’t understand. The word salud in the old Spanish sometimes meant salvation, too.” But the word salvación (salvation) is superior to the word salud (health) in reference to salvation of the soul. The Word salvación clears up any confusion as to what the verse is talking about (salvation from sin and hell, vs. healing of the body)! Note: The 1602 and 1865 say correctly in Romans 1:16: Porque no me avergüenzo del evangelio de Cristo; porque es el poder de Dios para salvación a todo aquel que cree; al judío primeramente, y también al griego. They use “salvation here, again the same Greek word σωτηρία (sōtēria). But the 1909, a later revision, says in Romans 1:16: Porque no me avergüenzo del evangelio: porque es potencia de Dios para salud á todo aquel que cree; al Judío primeramente y también al Griego. The 1909 uses the word salud (health) for the same Greek word σωτηρία (sōtēria). But the RVG says “salvation” in all of these verses!! 2. Have you ever heard a Spanish speaking person use the name “Lucifer,” referring to Satan? I have here in Paraguay. But where did they learn that word? Is it from the Spanish Bible? NO!! NOT ONE SPANISH BIBLE HAS THE WORD LUCIFER (1602, 1865, 1909 or 1960), until now in the RVG 2010! The King James Bible says in Isaiah 14:12: How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! The RVG 2010 says: ¡Cómo caíste del cielo, oh Lucifer, hijo de la mañana! Cortado fuiste por tierra, tú que debilitabas las naciones. Because the 1602, 1865, 1909 and 1960 have failed to read like the King James Bible, they made a big mess. Instead of calling Satan “Lucifer,” they call Satan “Lucero.” But Jesus Christ is called “el Lucero” in most Bibles in 2 Peter 1:19. So Jesus is basically called the devil in other Spanish Bibles. For example, the 1865 says : ¡Cómo caiste del cielo, o! Lucero, hijo de la mañana! ¡cortado fuiste por tierra, el que debilitabas las naciones! In 2 Peter 1:19, other Spanish Bibles say: Tenemos también la palabra profética más firme: a la cual hacéis bien de estar atentos como a una candela que alumbra en un lugar oscuro, hasta que el día esclareza, y el lucero de la mañana salga en vuestros corazones: But the RVG 2010 says “Lucifer” in Isaiah 14:12, like the King James Bible, and “la estrella de la mañana” in 2 Peter 1:19. THE “RVG 2010” IS THE ONLY SPANISH BIBLE THAT ELIMINATES THE CONFUSION. 3. The 1602, 1865, 1909 and 1960 Spanish Bibles degrade marriage. If I came to your church with my family and wanted to present them and our ministry to Paraguay, and I said: “I would like to introduce my children and my WOMAN,” honestly, how would you feel? What would you say to me? WHAT WOULD MY WIFE SAY? How would you like your Bible to say in Ephesians 5:28: So ought men to love their women as their own bodies. He that loveth his woman loveth himself. Or in Ephesians 5:31: For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and shall be joined unto his woman, and they two shall be one flesh. A man could have a wife and a woman or women on the side at the same time and justify himself by this translation! But this is ADULTERY!! A man could leave his father and mother and be joined to or living with his woman and justify himself by this translation! But this is FORNICATION! It teaches that a man can live with a woman and not get married. But scriptures say a man shall be joined to his WIFE. The word in Spanish for woman is mujer The word in Spanish for wife is esposa. So of course the RVG says esposa (wife)! Amen! Look at how many times the word “wife” is used in the 1602, 1865, 1909, 1960 and the RVG 2010: The 1602 uses the word “wife” 20 times The 1865 uses the word “wife” 15 times The 1909 uses the word “wife” 20 times The 1960 uses the word “wife” 27 times The RVG 2010 uses “wife” 361 times. “WOW! BIG DIFFERENCE!” Which Spanish Bible would you want to use??? Which Spanish Bible would your esposa to use??? 4. The 1602, 1865 and 1909 Spanish Bibles say in Psalm 68:11: The Lord gave the word: great was the crowd of women evangelists that published it. Other Spanish Bibles say “las evangelistas” which means women evangelists, or something similar. Nelson Giménez says: “There is a great difference between the languages, that many missionaries don’t understand, and what I’m referring to is THE GENDERS, and this Bible verse is a good example. First of all, the Spanish language has definite genders, masculine and feminine! For example, in John 1:1 “The Word” referring to Jesus c͟o͟u͟l͟d͟ n͟o͟t͟ literally be translated into Spanish, because it would be rendered as the feminine la Palabra, feminizing the description of the deity of Christ. So John 1:2 would say “the world was made by HER.” The word Palabra is found in the Jehovah’s Witnesses’ Spanish translation and the 1602P from Monterrey. For Spanish-speakers, the preserved word is el Verbo. El Verbo is the Word in action (“Alive” in Hebrews 4:12) in the masculine gender, because He is alive! Using la Palabra for John 1:1 in Spanish goes directly against Spanish grammar. Because when you say la Palabra you’re referring to Ella (her) which would be a woman! So then every verse talking about Jesus in the first chapter of John would have to say “she”. With this example in mind, let’s check the Bible verse in question. Las evangelistas is in the feminine gender. (1602, 1865, 1909) In Spanish, the context defines the gender. But las evangelistas (women evangelists, plural) in the 1602, 1865 and 1909, is referring specifically to WOMEN only, not to men. The 1960 Spanish Bible has “Las que llevaban buenas nuevas” Again this is the feminine gender, women only, not men. For it to be men, it would have to say “Los que llevaban.” In this case “los” includes men as evangelists. So it should say, Los evangelistas. The RVG 2010 has it right in Psalm 68:11: “El Señor daba palabra: Grande era el ejército de aquellos que la publicaban.” The words here in this verse, “el ejército de aquellos,” mean people, including both men and women. Note that ejercito is in the masculine gender. What Bible would you use? The 1602? 1865? 1909? 1960? I use the RVG 2010. NOW YOU SEE WHY! 5. The 1602, 1865, 1909 and especially the 1960 have problems with the word for HELL, infierno The 1960 removes the word “hell" in the entire Old Testament and replaces “hell" with Sheol, an untranslated Hebrew word. The 1960 also removes the word “hell" many times in the New Testament, replacing it with the untranslated Greek word Hades. Do you think I could use this Bible with a good clean conscience? No, I could not. Here in Paraguay, South America, the Jehovah Witnesses love the 1960 Spanish Bible because it removes the word “hell," which they don’t believe in. The 1909 has the word Gehenna instead of infierno (Hell). In Mark 9:43, 45, 47 and in Luke 12:5, why would the 1909 translate the Greek word Hades to “hell,” but leave the Greek word Gehenna? How many times is the word Hell used in the 1602, 1865, 1909, 1960 and the RVG. The 1602 used the word “hell” 30 times The 1865 used the word “hell” 40 times The 1909 used the word “hell” 30 times The 1960 used the word “hell” 13 times The RVG 2010 used the word “hell” 54 times The KJB also used the word “hell” 54 times Interesting Note: The KJB Translators had access and consulted the 1602 Spanish Bible when they did their translation, they chose NOT TO FOLLOW the way the Spanish translators translated the words Sheol and Hades! Here are some definitions of the words Sheol and Hades: Easton’s Bible Dictionary: Hades: That which is out of sight, a Greek word used to denote the state or place of the dead. All the dead alike go into this place. To be buried, to go down to the grave, to descend into Hades, are equivalent expressions. In the LXX [Septuagint]. This word is the usual rendering of the Hebrew Sheol, the common receptacle of the departed International Standard Bible Encyclopedia: Hades: hā´dēz (Αδης, Haidēs, “not to be seen”): Hades, Greek originally Haidou, in genitive, “the house of Hades,” then, as nominative, designation of the abode of the dead itself. The word occurs in the New Testament in Matt. 11:23 (parallel Luke 10:15); Matt. 16:18; Luke 16:23; Acts 2:27, Acts 2:31; Rev. 1:18; Rev. 6:8; Rev. 20:13f. It is also found in the Textus Receptus of the New Testament 1Cor. 15:55… Thayer’s Lexicon: Hades: δης (hadēs) 1)A proper name: Hades or Pluto, the god of the lower regions 2)Orcus, the nether world, the realm of the dead 3)Later use of this word: the grave, death, hell Strong’s Dictionary: hadēs (hah'-dace): As a negative particle, properly unseen, that is, “Hades” or the place (state) of departed souls: - grave, hell. There are three main uses of Sheol and Hades: 1. Grave; 2. Death; and 3. Hell. Note: This was intended to show you the confusion and the apostasy when you leave the blessed King James Bible. Sheol and Hades means a place of torment “Hell” or in Spanish Infierno, a literal burning fire where the lost or “unsaved” go when they die. Where the King James Bible translators translated the word Sheol as “hell” it is correct. When they translated the word Sheol as “the grave” it is correct. The same goes for Hades. The Jehovah’s Witnesses and the 7th Day Adventists believe that Sheol and Hades do not mean a literal burning fire where lost souls will burn after they die, then later cast into a burning lake of fire for eternity Revelation 20:14-15. So leaving it up to the reader to decide what Sheol or Hades means is a big mistake!! The 1865 Spanish Bible vs. The RVG Spanish Bible on the Word “Hell” Note: The word “sepulcro” means tomb Note: The word “sima” means an empty space in the earth. Note: The word “profundo” means deep or far into. Note: The word “Infierno” means hell, where souls suffer in fire for eternity. Note: The word “osario” means a cemetery or a place where bones dwell. Mora-Pratt 1865 RVG 2010 Deuteronomy 32:22 profundo Infierno 2 Samuel 22:6 sepulcro Infierno Psalm 18:5 sepulcro Infierno Psalm 16:10 sepulcro Infierno Proverbs 7:27 sepulcro Infierno Proverbs 9:18 sepulcro Infierno Proverbs15:24 sima Infierno Proverbs 27:20 sepulcro Infierno Isaiah 28:15 sepulcro Infierno Habakkuk 2:5 osario su alma Infierno su alma WEIGH THE EVIDENCE!! Many people really do not understand the issue. In the past, most churches and ministries have listened to what a Spanish speaking preacher said, who was trying to promote his Bible. And the church said “OK,” because they put their confidence in the speaker, since they don’t know Spanish themselves. But now there is a lot of information and articles about the Spanish Bible issue. Most information that other Bible believers have studied and put out are true concerning history of the Spanish Bible, Reina-Valera, comparison charts between versions, etc. Right now the majority of Christians are divided on which Bible to use in Spanish. Most use the 1960 revision and the others use the 1602,1865,1909,1960 and now, Praise God, the RVG 2010, THE REINA VALERA GOMEZ. Note: it is called Reina Valera Gomez, because Dr Humberto Gomez has revised Reina and Valera’s work so it would be in line with the Textus Receptus, Masoretic texts and the King James Bible. One thing that many users of the 1602, 1865 and 1909 Spanish Bibles have in common is they know with clear evidence that the 1960 version has left the Textus Receptus and Masoretic texts in many places. This is true of the 1960, which is worse than the 1602, 1865 and 1909 Bibles. But it is also true of the 1602, 1865 and 1909 Bibles, since in places they also left the Textus Receptus and Masoretic texts. 6. The 1602, 1865, 1909 and 1960 Spanish Bibles left the pure manuscripts in many places. The RVG 2010 didn’t leave those manuscripts IN A SINGLE PLACE! Rex Cobb “Bible Translators” made a chart of how many times these Spanish Bibles left the Textus Receptus in 220 verses in the New Testament The 1602 left the Textus Receptus 57 times The 1865 left the Textus Receptus 28 times The 1909 left the Textus Receptus 122 times The 1960 left the Textus Receptus 191 times The RVG 2010 left the Textus Receptus 0 times (zero) After studying this issue for 2 years I’m 100% convinced that the RVG 2010 Gómez is the Word of God for the Spanish speaking people. I have personally used the 1960 and 1865 in the pulpit. BUT NO LONGER. I have read and studied the others. •Imagine telling people they are going to Hades or Sheol when they die. (1960 says Sheol and Hades instead of “hell”). •Imagine telling your church husbands love your “women” instead of “wives” (the 1602, 1865, 1909 and 1960 Spanish Bibles say “women” instead of “wife” or “wives” 95% of the time). •Imagine teaching that you have to “grow into your salvation” (this is “works salvation”, taught by the 1960 in 1Peter 2:2). •Imagine preaching Romans 10:10, “for with the heart man believeth unto righteousness and with the mouth confession is made unto health,” not salvation (as in the 1602, 1865 and 1909). •Imagine a Bible that makes Jesus Christ, The Savior of the World, GOD INCARNATE into a sinner in danger of the judgment (as the 1960 does in Mark 4:5 and Matthew 5:22). Or a Bible that says Jesus needs to be purified along with Mary (Luke 2:22), Making Jesus a sinner. •Imagine not one verse in the Old Testament, not one, that has the word “hell” infierno (like the 1960). THE RVG 2010 HAS ALL OF THESE VERSES CORRECT. Here is another great thing about the RVG 2010 Spanish Bible. The word “Mercy Seat” (propiciatorio) is used 28 times in the RVG: The 1602: 2 times The 1865: 2 times The 1909: 2 times The 1960: 28 times The RVG 2010: 28 times In place of propiciatorio they use cubierta (cover). The importance of the Word “Mercy Seat” Brown Driver Briggs Lexicon: כפרת (kapporeth) 1) mercy-seat, place of atonement 1a) the golden plate of propitiation on which the High Priest sprinkled the seat 7 times on the Day of Atonement symbolically reconciling Jehovah and His chosen people 1a1) the slab of gold on top of the ark of the covenant which measured 2.5 by 1.5 cubits; on it and part of it were the two golden cherubim facing each other whose outstretched wings came together above and constituted the throne of God Strong’s Dictionary: mercy-seat - כפרת capporeth, from כפר caphar, to cover or overspread; because by an act of pardon. Sins are represented as being covered, so that they no longer appear in the eye of Divine justice to displease, irritate, and call for punishment; and the person of the offender is covered or protected from the stroke of the broken law. The 1602, 1865, 1909 use the word cubierta, which means a cover or a lid instead of “Mercy Seat,” but they did use the word “Mercy Seat” twice. So they could have used it the other 26 times. This is an important Doctrine. Mercy Seat also means “Propitiation.” Strong’s Dictionary: PROPITIATION, n. (propisia'shon) - mercy seat, propitiation 1.The act of appeasing wrath and conciliating the favor of an offended person; the act of making propitious. 2.In theology, the atonement or atoning sacrifice offered to God to assuage his wrath and render him propitious to sinners. Christ is the propitiation for the sins of men (Romans 3; 1 John 2). The RVG reads better having the word “Mercy Seat” (propiciatorio) 28 times. A note from Valera: Valera said in his estimation, his revision is an “excellent translation,” but that he did not think it was perfect is clearly seen in his preface, when he calls upon other, more pious and learned men to revise his own work and correct it. He says: “Would to God that by his infinite mercy inspire the heart of the King to command pious men throughout his coasts, learned in Hebrew and Greek to look into and revise this translation of the Bible, who excitedly with a pious and sincere desire to serve God and do well to their nation, would compare it and confront the Hebrew text, that God dictated to his holy prophets before the coming of Christ, and with the Greek text, that the same dictated to his holy apostles and evangelists after the coming of Christ in the flesh.” Reina also recommended that his work should be revised. That is exactly what Dr. Humberto Gomez has done in the RVG 2010. I believe the RVG 2010 is by far the best Spanish Bible out there. I would also say it is the Word of God for the Spanish speaking people. You have read only a few of the reasons why. Weigh the evidence. Get a copy and study the RVG 2010 see for yourself. My intention is not to fight the brethren, but to get the truth out. That is my purpose as a God-called preacher, to get the truth out and win souls to Christ (Proverbs 29:18). The RVG 2010 is true to the Textus Receptus, the Masoretic Text and the King James Bible. Endorsements: "We have used the RVG in our churches and Bible Institute for more than 2 years. We have found it to be the most accurate translation available in Spanish... I am proud to endorse the revision by Bro. Gomez." Brother Tim Urling Missionary to Mexico ---------------------- "It has been demonstrated to our satisfaction that every mistake we have ever been shown in any of the Spanish versions has been corrected in the RVG revision. It is our prayer that the Lord would sanction this revision with a great revival throughout the Hispanic world." Pastor Tim Fellure Victory Baptist Church ---------------------- "I am pleased to recommend the Spanish Bible of Dr. Humberto Gomez. I have found him to be a kind, careful, humble, and able student who has spent hundreds of hours in carrying out his burden to get the Spanish Bible of 1909 (by which he was led to the Lord Jesus Christ as his Saviour) in line with the Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek Words underlying the King James Bible. He has done this." D. A. Waite, Th.D., Ph.D., Dean Burgon Society Inc. ---------------------- "I have compared his Endorsements: "We have used the RVG in our churches and Bible Institute for more than 2 years. We have found it to be the most accurate translation available in Spanish... I am proud to endorse the revision by Bro. Gomez." Brother Tim Urling Missionary to Mexico ---------------------- "It has been demonstrated to our satisfaction that every mistake we have ever been shown in any of the Spanish versions has been corrected in the RVG revision. It is our prayer that the Lord would sanction this revision with a great revival throughout the Hispanic world." Pastor Tim Fellure Victory Baptist Church ---------------------- "I am pleased to recommend the Spanish Bible of Dr. Humberto Gomez. I have found him to be a kind, careful, humble, and able student who has spent hundreds of hours in carrying out his burden to get the Spanish Bible of 1909 (by which he was led to the Lord Jesus Christ as his Saviour) in line with the Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek Words underlying the King James Bible. He has done this." D. A. Waite, Th.D., Ph.D., Dean Burgon Society Inc. ---------------------- "I have compared his revision (RVG) with other Reina Valera versions, the Textus Receptus, and the King James Bible in my own studies and have found it to be 100% faithful to the Traditional texts. The Spanish language and integrity of the Reina Valera Bible is kept intact. Most importantly, IT IS 100% FREE OF ANY CRITICAL TEXT READINGS WHATSOEVER! Consequently, it reads closer and almost parallel (barring language differences) to the King James Bible...I not only recommend it but I intend to stand for it as I endeavor to reach hispanic souls for Christ." Manny Rodriguez Missionary in Puerto Rico ---------------------- "I bought a Bible with the King James English on one page and the Reina-Valera 1960 on the other page. I very quickly started finding NIV-type readings in the Spanish. I next ordered a 1909 Reina-Valera, but after checking a few proof texts, I found some of the same NIV-type readings. I eventually ordered an 1865 Reina-Valera, but there were still many readings in this Bible that I did not agree with. Then, a few months ago, I discovered the RVG. I checked verse after verse after verse, and I must say that I breathed a sigh of relief as I found what I believe to be the closest Spanish Bible to the King James." Robert W. Thurman Predicando La Verdad Ministries Cleveland, Tennessee (RVG) with other Reina Valera versions, the Textus Receptus, and the King James Bible in my own studies and have found it to be 100% faithful to the Traditional texts. The Spanish language and integrity of the Reina Valera Bible is kept intact. Most importantly, IT IS 100% FREE OF ANY CRITICAL TEXT READINGS WHATSOEVER! Consequently, it reads closer and almost parallel (barring language differences) to the King James Bible...I not only recommend it but I intend to stand for it as I endeavor to reach hispanic souls for Christ." Manny Rodriguez Missionary in Puerto Rico ---------------------- "I bought a Bible with the King James English on one page and the Reina-Valera 1960 on the other page. I very quickly started finding NIV-type readings in the Spanish. I next ordered a 1909 Reina-Valera, but after checking a few proof texts, I found some of the same NIV-type readings. I eventually ordered an 1865 Reina-Valera, but there were still many readings in this Bible that I did not agree with. Then, a few months ago, I discovered the RVG. I checked verse after verse after verse, and I must say that I breathed a sigh of relief as I found what I believe to be the closest Spanish Bible to the King James." Robert W. Thurman Predicando La Verdad Ministries Cleveland, Tennessee

Price: 20.88 USD

Location: Medford, Oregon

End Time: 2024-02-21T06:38:02.000Z

Shipping Cost: 5.7 USD