💥1986 SP SET 5 G1 Transformers MB RC Cards GALVATRON CYCLONUS+ PSA RETIED💥

Description: BE SURE TO CHECK OUT ALL MY Star Wars psa cards, 1984 Transformers RC's psa 1982 Gi Joe psa rc cards, Star Trek, Grease, And many more Non-Sports from the 1960's 70's and 80's PSA AUCTIONS. Some very unique rc's that are one of kind 1st time psa cards. THIS AUCTION IS FOR THE FOLLOWING CARD: 1986 Milton Bradley Complete set All 5 Rc G1 post movie transformers game cardsGALVATRON, CYCLONUS, DEFENSOR, MOTORMASTER, SILVERBOLT(LAST THREE PHOTOS ARE ONLY EXAMPLES TO SHOW WHAT THEY LOOK LIKE GRADED, THEY ARE NOT INCLUDED, JUST THE FIVE UNGRADED RAW CARDS ONLY ONLY ONLY) 1.75 in x 2.65 in They are the original and only 1986 version of the g1 Rc cards for these figures. There were only 5 figures made into cards by Milton Bradley for the overseas Short print Game.(THE LAST THREE PHOTOS SHOW WHAT THEY LOOK LIKE WHEN GRADED BUT THEY ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS LISTING, JUST THE 5 UNGRADED RAW CARDS. THE GRADED ARE NOT NOT NOT NOT INCLUDED) I SUBMITTED A LARGE AMOUNT OF THESE TO PSA TO BE GRADED After I Received Pre Approval for Grading and after about 40 of them were graded and came back, my other batches were all sent back saying they retired these for the time being, without reason why? THIS BATCH AND THREE OTHERS ALL CAME FROM A BRAND NEW SEALED GAME. It was extremely frustrating because they are wafer thin and almost impossible to find unused in game play, These are all very nice. Card WILL BE PLACED IN A CARD SAVER IV TYPE HOLDER FOR SHIPPING I DO COMBINE ON SHIPPING AT .50 CENTS MORE A CARD Authenticity guaranteed CHECK/SCAN QR CODE FOR PSA REGISTRY VERIFICATION OF CARD PSA RETIRED vs. PSA NLG vs. PSA N/A PSA Retired means that PSA will no longer grade a certain card. PSA NLG means grading was approved and completed and then recalled before shipped. PSA n/a means that PSA is stating that there was not enough spec information on the product to approve grading, but could still be approved for grading. In 2023 I submitted close to 1000 submissions of new products to be graded. The problem is that from start to finish the Left hand at PSA doesn’t tell the Right hand what they are doing. There is no systematic communication log between all channels. I have spent 100’s of hours sending in spec information for new products that have been approved, graded, and shipped back to me but then the next submission reaches the Research stage 2 and they have no documented information about the approval. And if you don’t get the same person who approved it originally, then based on the new person it can get rejected. I have had submissions (with the same exact product) graded and shipped back to me, new submissions past the grading process right before shipment and then a new batch get flagged for no spec info when they had it for months originally approved. Then if you explain this to them, they will then take your graded cards ready to be shipped and change them to no longer grading or not enough spec info. Even if you can then prove you sent the original spec info in and have 200 plus cards of the same exact product type completed submissions already shipped back to you months ago. Even when you submit spec info with each submission, the approval is never logged in for the next research team member to reference it and it can easily get rejected. Even when you get pre-approval through submitting a research request it can then get rejected once submitted because they never ever log the info you sent in and never log that it has been approved. Then the countless phone calls trying to get it corrected will get you nowhere because they will say your free to submit it again with spec information or in my case you will get red flagged like the character Elaine did in Seinfeld at the doctors and you will have all new submissions immediately get rejected regardless of hundreds of pages of spec info straight from the manufacturer.

Price: 15.99 USD

Location: Reisterstown, Maryland

End Time: 2024-12-05T19:39:53.000Z

Shipping Cost: 4 USD